-> Democratic Liberal Umbrella Politics

-> Recent Posts

-> DLU Live Stream

How Europe Could Sink Obama’s Election Chances–And What He Can Do About It

How Europe Could Sink Obama’s Election Chances–And What He Can Do About It > Political Opinion > Political Views > DLU Articles > Democratic Liberal Umbrella

>by Ed Kilgore, May 28, 2012 12:26 PM EST | The Democratic Strategist |TDS Co-Editor William Galston|

This item by TDS Co-Editor William Galston is cross-posted from the New Republic.

Europe’s Greek tragedy has now entered its final act, with potentially fateful consequences for the global economy–and for Barack Obama, whose reelection may hinge on the decisions of Germany in the coming weeks. The 2012 election will pivot on the public’s evaluation of the president’s economic stewardship, and a perceptible decline in the U.S.growth rate–which a badly handled Greek exit from the Eurozone would cause–could easily spell the difference between victory and defeat. Obama’s fate, then, may well lie in Angela Merkel’s hands. That doesn’t mean, though, that there’s nothing he can do about it.

When You Are President

The Democratic Strategist

What are the economic stakes? Mark Cliffe, ING‘s head of Financial Markets Research, has conducted the most detailed analysis that I know of. He examines two scenarios–a Greek exit from a Eurozone that remains intact, and an exit that triggers a complete collapse of the European monetary union. The consequences of the latter would be catastrophic. In the first year alone, Eurozone GDP would fall by 9 percent. Inflation in the “peripheral economies” such as Spain and Portugal would head toward double digits, while the Eurozone core–especially Germany–would suffer a “deflationary shock.” Because the dollar would surge in relation to whatever national currencies might emerge, the United States would undergo that shock as well, and the exchange-rate jolt to U.S. competitiveness would reduce the odds of a sustained recovery in U.S. exports–a cornerstone of Obama’s growth strategy.

The consequences of a Greek exit considered in isolation would be less serious, of course. Even so, they are not pretty. Cliffe projects that the Eurozone would undergo a major recession and experience significantly higher levels of unemployment. In the United States, GDP growth would slow to only 1.3 percent in 2012 and 1.7 percent in 2013. Unemployment would stop falling and stagnate at current levels for the remainder of this year. These developments would make it harder for Obama to argue that we’re heading in the right direction, and–based on my analysis of recent elections involving incumbents–I suspect that economic growth at these depressed levels would mean victory for Mitt Romney.

From the American standpoint, the best outcome is concerted European action to keep Greece within the fold, while the second best outcome is a strategy that delays the inevitable until Europe can strengthen its defenses against contagion.

But there’s a problem: Many key European officials and observers have concluded that a Greek exit is both inevitable and manageable. A lengthy article in Der Spiegel makes this case, going so far as to argue that the consequences of doing what would be necessary to keep Greece in the monetary union would be worse than allowing it to leave. And Germany’s powerful Bundesbank agrees. Its most recent monthly report states: “A significant dilution of existing agreements [concerning Greece] would damage confidence in all euro area agreements and treaties and strongly weaken incentives for national reform.” Crucially, Germany’s central bank has concluded that Europe could successful deal with a Greek exit: “The challenges this would create for the euro area and for Germany would be considerable but manageable given prudent crisis management.”

To be sure, many other leaders–especially in France and Italy–are far more concerned about Europe’s ability to contain the consequences of Greece’s departure. France’s new president, Francois Hollande, is pushing the European Central Bank to provide further liquidity and intervene in sovereign debt markets. But the stark fact is that right now these leaders’ views don’t matter all that much. Angela Merkel, Germany’s new iron chancellor, holds the veto, and she appears unyielding. And (it must be said) German opinion from top to bottom seems driven by the tale of the ant and the grasshopper. Germany’s success in no accident, Germans believe. A thrifty, disciplined people bit the bullet and made the painful structural adjustments that long-term prosperity requires. Now it’s time for others to follow suit.

Until now, the ability of the United States to influence Eurozone policy has been modest, and many of our efforts to do so have produced resentment. So what is President Obama to do? If he believes, as I think he should, that the global economy, U.S. economy, and his own electoral prospects all hang in the balance, then he should call Merkel and propose a quick summit between the two leaders and their respective economic teams. He should come armed with a menu of concrete steps that the United States and major international institutions would be willing to take if Germany were to change course. He should appeal to Germany’s self-interest as the major beneficiary of the expanded export market the Eurozone has created. He should remind Merkel of the sacrifices that the United States made over many decades to help build a Europe that is free, whole, and united. And he should make it clear in private, and announce in public, that from the American standpoint, what touches all concerns all: Chancellor Merkel is not free to proceed as though the current crisis affects only Germany (or Europe) and the rest of the world has no legitimate say in the outcome.

Granted, this would be a bold and risky step. There’s no guarantee of success, and it would surely strain ties between the United States and one of its most important allies. Obama could return empty-handed, resulting in a diplomatic catastrophe. But the alternative is worse–to stand by while the dominant European country allows short-term politics, nationalist myopia, and misplaced moralism to substitute for far-sighted statesmanship that promotes a broader good.


 Ed Kilgore:

Special Correspondent

Ed Kilgore is a special correspondent and columnist for The New Republic. He is also managing editor of The Democratic Strategist, a well-known online publication, and a senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute. Earlier in his career, he was vice president for policy at the Democratic Leadership Council; an intergovernmental relations liaison and speechwriter for three governors of his home state of Georgia; and communications director for U.S. Senator Sam Nunn. His work has been published widely, by TNR, the Washington Monthly, The American Prospect, National Review, Salon, Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Blueprint, and various newspapers. He has also been a frequent guest on radio and television shows on networks ranging from CSPAN and CNN to MSNBC and NPR. Kilgore has served on the script and [speech-writing] teams of the last six Democratic National Conventions. He is a graduate of Emory University and the University of Georgia School of Law.

William Galston:

Professor, School of Public Affairs, University of Maryland and Director, Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy

William Galston (Ph.D. in Political Science, University of Chicago), is a political theorist who both studies and participates in American politics and domestic policy. In the first two years of President Clinton’s administration, Galston served as the Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy. He formerly taught at the University of Texas, Austin in the Government Department, and served as Director of Economic and Social Programs at the Roosevelt Center for American Policy Studies in Washington, DC. Other experience includes stints as issue director for Walter Mondale’s presidential campaign (1982-1984), senior [adviser] to Albert Gore, Jr., in his 1988 run for the Democratic presidential nomination. Galston is a founding co-editor of The Responsive Community, a journal that explores the issues of community, responsibility, and the common good in public policy. His most recent book is Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State (1991), and he has also authored a series of articles on family policy. In recent years Galston has focused increasingly on family policy.


Speculators:

Speculators may rely on an asset appreciating in price due to any of a number of factors that cannot be well enough understood by the speculator to make an investment-quality decision. Some such factors are shifting consumer tastes, fluctuating economic conditions, buyers’ changing perceptions of the worth of a stock security, economic factors associated with market timing, the factors associated with solely chart-based analysis, and the many influences over the short-term movement of securities.

Financial speculation can involve the trade (buying, holding, selling) and short-selling of stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, collectibles, real estate, derivatives, or any valuable financial instrument to attempt to profit from fluctuations in its price irrespective of its underlying value. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on Speculation.

The problem with speculators and speculation is that it gives the opposition [the GOP Strategist] ammunition to load their guns [fugitive dialogue] and shoot them towards the Obama Administration; just hoping that they would score big time to bring down the house in the November election. The next thing you will hear coming from the Right-wing — Austerity measures, Global economic and European debt crisis affects the U.S. Economy — in order to bring about — double dip recession and/or depression — to the US. They [the GOP] will try to use anything negative to throw at Obama; especially on economics because they feel that the U.S Economy is Obama’s weakness. I beg to differ; the problem for the Obama Administration is the GOP’s Obstructionist Party; holding America and her people – hostage and using any means necessary to do so! This topic is right in line with the GOP’s – talking points for the conservative deadhead! The GOP loves throwing – rocks! Gbismarc!


[important]Join the DLU in the quest to Re-elect the President and Turn Congress – Blue![/important]


Obama's Spending

Obama spending binge never happened

We need people to come together and support the President in this election of 2012, the push to Turn Congress and this Country – Blue; strengthening our democracy. Your supports are vital to our success — take this opportunity and donate today. Thanks you!

Democratic Liberal Umbrella – Organization of Mainstream, Grassroots Americans! Join the DLU!

Let’s Turn Congress and this Country – Blue! Let’s Be Liberals and Vote the Right-wing – Out!

Gbismarc! Democratic Liberal Umbrella will give you the bitter and the sweet! Join the cause – Your Support Helps!  …Enjoy! I’m ready for a game of Chess – Gbismarc!

Support President Obama and the Democratic Party! Thank you for your Contribution!

Help the DLU make a goal of $1000.00 dollars by the end of May! We can do this to re-elect the President and Turn Congress – Blue! Follow the link below: https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/dluturncongressblue?refcode=thermometer


 

 

DLU Related Posts:

Leave a Reply

Archives

Democratic Liberal Umbrella © 2013

Social Widgets powered by AB-WebLog.com.

View Robert Gallimore's profile on LinkedIn

WP Like Button Plugin by Free WordPress Templates